Antibiotics in Coloproctology
Compiled and edited by :.
Dr.Barin Bose MS
Consultant Surgeon and Coloproctologist
Jabalpur Hospital and Research Centre.
Jabalpur (M.P.)
GLIMPSES FROM HISTORY ANTISEPSIS & ANTIBIOTICS
Antisepsis
- Earlier days- surgery followed by infection & pus laudable.
- Egyptian embalmers - able to prevent putrefaction skills of
mummification.
- Hippocrates (460-377 B.C.) recognized the antiseptic properties
of wine, oil, and vinegar & used in dressing of wounds.
- Microscopy - 17th century- confirmed the presence of microbes.
- Theory of spontaneous generation
- 1860-Sir Louis Pasteur -Germ theory of disease.
- Heinrich Koch (1843-1910) proved that germs cause disease.
And laid down Kochs postulates
- 1843- Ignaz Semmelweiss introduced washing of hands
in an antiseptic chloride solution before examining patients.
- 1867 Sir Joseph Lister, introduced, technique and principles
of antisepsis for surgery - LANCET, 1867
- 1890 - William Halsted, use of Rubber gloves in surgery
.
Antibiotics.
- First systemic antiseptic - Ehrlich arsenical named
Salvarsan- effective against spirochetes- Magic Bullet
- 1929 Sir Alexander Fleming discovered Penicillin-
accidentally from a mould Pencillium notatum.
- 1935- Domagk discovered Prontosil active ingredient
Sulfanilamide- first of Sulphonamides- effective against
Gonorrhea.
- 1940s, A. Schatz and S. Waksman - Streptomycin, effective
against both G -ve bacteria and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
- 1947- Chloramphenicol was discovered.
Surgical infections.
Defn: Surgical Infections are those that
-
- Present as a result of a surgical procedure Surgical Site
Infections ( SSI)
- Require surgical intervention as part of the treatment. ( E.g.
Intra abdominal abscess, acute appendicitis etc)
Characteristics of a surgical infection:
-
- Result of a damaged host defense system- esp. injury to the epithelial
barrier.
- Pathogens causing infection are usually mixed aerobic &
anaerobic.
- Pathogens are from patients own endogenous flora( Opportunistic).
- Usually accompanies tissue necrosis.
* Primary principle when treating surgical infection is source control.
(E.g. abscess drainage, closure of perforation etc,.)
* Antibiotic treatment and systemic support - only adjunctive therapies
, and wont resolve surgical infection without operative Rx
Pathogens in surgical infections.
Bacteria of surgical infections are broadly divided into aerobic &
facultative bacteria in one gr and anerobic bacteria in another / into
Gram + ve & Gram _ve bacteria / into Bacilli & Cocci.
- Source of pathogens can be:
- endogenous or exogenous.
But most surgical infections are caused by endogenous bacteria.
Mostly mixed flora- aerobic & anaerobic.
Specific bacteria found in specific parts of the body , exposed anatomic
areas during procedures source of pathogens.
Endogenous source:
-
- acquired from individuals own commensals.
- Common after trauma , surgery and instrumentation, and in lowered
local or general resistance.
- Commensal flora, not of consistent composition, is constantly
changing , altered by antibiotics- broad spectrum .
- Many commensals are potential pathogens.
- Skin & mucus membranes: skin is rich in staph epidermidis,
micrococci, coryneforms and anaerobic cocci. On mucus membranes
flora is predominantly anaerobic. 30% of people are carriers of Staph
aureus a potential pathogen particularly in axilla, toe webs, nose.
- Gastro intestinal tract: few organisms in stomach and small
intestine. Large intestine vast microbial flora, predominantly
anaerobic. Such as Bacteroides spp, Bifidobacteria and Clostridia.
Also aerobes like E.coli & Enterococcus.
Exogenous source:
- Acquired from a source outside the patient. Can be from :
-
- Human source.
- Animal source
3. Environmental source: community acquired or hospital acquired
Why need to know:
-
- for suspecting the possible pathogen causing infection .
- to suspect the origin of an unknown source of infection in pts
with +ve blood culture.
- for selection of appropriate antibiotics
-
- to start intelligent empiric therapy.
- To direct antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Antibiotics in colorectal surgery
Why & When.
- To treat established Surgical infections-Antibiotic Therapy.
- For Antibiotic Prophylaxis prior to surgery.
Antibiotic therapy
Therapy aimed at established surgical infections.
Goal of antibiotic therapy:
- To achieve a concentration of antibiotic in the infected tissue that
exceeds the MIC by 3 or 4 times for at least ¾ s of the time between
successive doses.
Principles of antibiotic therapy:
-
-
-
- Choice of Antibiotics.
- Route of administration.
- Duration & Dose of administration.
Choice of antibiotic:
- Most surgical infections are caused by mixed bacterial flora, it is
difficult to culture all these organisms and bacterial identification
takes a minimum of 48 -72 hrs.
- Hence antibiotics must be started empirically and directed at the
most likely pathogens.
- Gram staining & biochemical tests can help in providing earlier
guidances regarding which group of causative bacteria.
|
Bacteria on gram stain
|
Source
|
Initial calculated antibiotic therapy
|
|
G +ve cocci (chains)
|
Soft tissue
|
Pencillin G (10 mu tds)
|
|
G +ve cocci (clusters)
|
Soft tissue
|
-do-
|
|
G ve rods
|
Abdomen
|
Cefotaxime
|
|
G +ve rods
|
Soft tissue
|
Pencillin G (10 mu tds)
|
|
Mixed G +ve & -ve
|
Intra abdominal abscess
|
Cefotaxime + metronidazole / ampicillin+ sulbactum.
|
Facts to be considered when choosing an antibiotic for empiric
treatment.
- Coverage of the presumed organisms involved should be ensured. Starting
with broad spectrum drugs and narrowed down to specific organism isolated.
- Concentration of the antibiotic that can be achieved at the site of
infection.
- Toxicity should be considered , particularly in critically ill patients
in which bioavailability & therapeutic & toxic level range are
harder to predict.
- When a new antibiotic regimen is started , set a time limit for the
period for which the antibiotic will be given.
- The pathogenicity , synergism, and the antagonism exhibited by the
bacteria in various mixed infections.
- The negative effects of antibiotics with host defense mechanisms
- The results of well controlled clinical studies of unselected patients.
If obvious improvement is not seen within 2 or 3 days, one often hears
the ques which antibiotic should we switch to?
This Ques is appropriate only after the following questions have
been answered.
-
-
- was the initial operative procedure adequate?
- the initial procedure was adequate but has a complication
occurred?
- has a super infection developed at a new site?
- The drug choice is correct, but is enough is being given?
- The choice of antibiotics is not the most common cause of failure
unless the original choice was clearly inappropriate.
Route:
- Because of systemic response to infection & impaired GI function
in severe surgical infections Intravenous route is the preferred
route in initial antibiotic therapy.
- After initial parenteral therapy, patient can be switched to oral
antibiotics to complete the course.
Duration:
- Antibiotics are usually given for too long duration & in insufficient
dosages, because surgeons have problems distinguishing between contamination,
infection and continuing inflammation.
- Longer duration of therapy indicated in immunocompromised Pt or when
focus control is difficult.
When to stop ?
- A reliable guideline is to continue antibiotics until Pt has shown
obvious clinical improvement and has had a normal Temp for 48 hrs or
more.
- Signs of improvement include improved mental status, return of bowel
function, resolution of tachycardia, and spontaneous diuresis
|
Recommendations - Duration of antibiotic therapy in abdominal
infections following source control ..
|
|
Contamination: NO Postoperative Antibiotics.
|
- Gastroduodenal peptic perforation ( op within 12h )
- Traumatic enteric perforations operated within 12h
- Peritoneal contamination with bowel contents .
- Appendectomy ( early/phlegmonous appendicitis )
- Cholecystectomy (early/phlegmonous cholecystitis)
|
|
Resectable infection : 24 hr post operative antibiotics
|
- Appendectomy for gangrenous appendicitis.
- Cholecystectomy for gangrenous cholecystitis.
- Bowel resection for ischemic or strangulated bowel without perf.
|
Cont
..
|
MILD infection: 48 hrs of postoperative antibiotics
|
- Intra abdominal infection from diverse sources with localized
pus formation.
Late ( more than 12 hr) traumatic bowel perf and Gastro duodenal
perf, with no established intra abdominal inf.
|
|
MODERATE infection : upto 5 days of post op antibiotics.
|
|
1. Diffuse established intra abdominal infection from all sources.
|
|
SEVERE infection: more than 5 days of post op antibiotics.l
|
- Severe intra abdominal infection with the source not easily
controllable ( i.e., infected pancreatic necrosis.)
- Severe intra abdominal inf, treated with planned re laparotomies.
- Post operative intra- abdominal inf. Source: EJS 1997;576
|
Surgical site infections.
- Defined by: Surgical Wound Infection Task Force 1992.
- Defn. Postoperative infections that present in any location
along the surgical tract within 0 to 30 days after a surgical procedure
or within 1 yr in procedures involving implants.
-
- Incisional superficial ( skin, subcutaneous tissue)
-
- Incisional deep ( fascial planes, muscles)
-
- Organ/ space related ( anatomic location of procedure)
eg : intra abd abscess

- Incidence of SSI: 38%
- Most common: incisional infections : 60 -80% of SSIs.
- Organ related SSIs 93% of SSI related mortality.
CRITERIA FOR DEFINING A SURGICAL SITE INFECTION
Superficial incisional SSI
Criterias as per Defn. + at least one of the following:
- 1. purulent drainage, with or without laboratory confirmation, from
the superficial incision.
- 2. organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid
or tissue from the superficial incision.
- 3. at least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection:
_ pain or tenderness
_ localised swelling
_ redness
_ heat
- 4.diagnosis of superficial incisional SSI by the surgeon or attending
physician
Deep incisional SSI
Criterias as per defn + at least one of the following:
- 1. purulent drainage from deep incision .
- 2. a deep incision spontaneously dehisces or is deliberately opened
by a surgeon when the patient has either
_ fever (>38°C)
_ localised pain or
_ tenderness
- 3. an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision
is found on direct examination, during reoperation, or radiologic examination
- 4. diagnosis of deep incisional SSI by a surgeon or attending physician.
- Note: Report infection that involves both superficial and deep incision
sites or an organ/space SSI that drains through the incision as deep
incisional SSI.
Organ/space SSI
Criterias as per definition + at least one of the following:
- 1.purulent discharge from a drain that is placed through a stab wound
into the organ/space
- 2.organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid
or tissue in the organ/space
- 3.an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the organ/space
that is found on direct examination, during reoperation, or by histopathologic
or radiologic examination.
- 4.diagnosis of an organ/space SSI by a surgeon or attending physician.
Causes and Risk factors:
-
-
-
- Bacterial factors.
- Local wound factors.
- Patient factors.
Bacterial factors:
-
- Bacterial no., Virulence, antimicrobial resistance.
- Wound classification:
- Length of preoperative hospital stay.
- Remote site infection at the time of surgery.
- Duration of the procedure.
- Pre operative shaving.
- Intensive care unit patient.
- Prior antibiotic therapy.
- Bacterial no., Virulence, antimicrobial resistance.
-
- Toxins, resistance to phagocytosis, intracellular destruction.
- Surface components ( capsules, lipopolysaccharides)
- Bacterial load more than 105.
- Duration of the procedure:
Prolonged surgeries : > 75th percentile for that procedure.
- Preoperative shaving:
-
- Increases risk by 100%.
- Extensive shaving not needed. Removal by clippers before procedure
preferred.
-
- Prior antibiotic therapy : Increases chances of antibiotic resistance.
| Clean |
uninfected operative wound/
not entered visceral tracts/ primarily closed. |
1 to 5% |
| Clean
Contaminated
|
Visceral tracts opened under
control without much contamination. |
3 to 11% |
| Contaminated |
open fresh accidental wounds
/ operations with breaks in sterile technique/ gross spillage from
visceral tracts. |
10 to 17% |
| Dirty. |
traumatic wounds with dead
tissue/ with clinical inf / perforated viscera |
> 27% |
Antibiotic Prophylaxis applies to all Elective operations ( first 3 categories)
and Emergency operations of the clean type. Other categories Antibiotic
Therapy.
Local wound factors.
-
- Hematoma / seroma.
- necrosis.
- Sutures.
- Drains.
- Foreign bodies.
- All these factors, increase the risk of SSIs.
- Good surgical technique best way to avoid SSIs.
Patient factors.
-
-
-
- Comorbidities
- Age
- Immunosuppression
- Malignancy
- Obesity
- Diabetes
- Malnutrition.
- Perioperative transfusions
- Cigarette smoking
- inspired oxygen fraction
- Body temperature.
- Glucose control
American society of anaesthesiologists - Preoperative risk score ( ASA
score) based on Co-morbidities.
| ASA score |
Physical state |
| 1 |
Normal healthy patient |
| 2 |
patient with mild systemic
disease |
| 3 |
Pt with severe systemic disease-
limits activity but not incapacitating. |
| 4 |
Pt With incapacitating systemic
disease- constant threat to life. |
| 5 |
Moribund patient- not expected
to survive beyond 24hrs. |
An ASA score of > 2 , increases risk of SSI.
- inspired oxygen fraction: > 80% - ^ oxygen tension & white
cell function & decreases SSIs.
- Body temperature: Normothermia reduces SSIs.
- Glucose Control: control of glucose levels in perioperative period
and later upto 48 hrs reduces SSIs.
Prevention of SSIs:
Preventive measures can be:
-
- Micro organism related
- Local wound related
- Patient related
Microorganism related.
Primary measures that have proven effective.
-
- Aseptic & antiseptic technique.
- Proper antimicrobial prophylaxis.
- Implementation of surveillance programmes.
Aseptic and antiseptic techniques.
Environmental & architectural char. of OT.
- Size
- Air management
- Equipment handling
- Traffic rules
- Operating Room personnel asepsis and clothing.
Surgical site preparation.
- Antiseptic preoperative showers
- Skin preparation of the surgical site ( germicidal antiseptic, incise
drapes)
- Scrubbing ( 1st time 5 mins, consecutively 3 mins)
- Alcoholic hand scrub soln.
- Sterile drapes & gowns.
- Double gloving.
Preventive measures can also be classified as:
| Timing of action |
Microorganism |
Local |
Patient |
| Preoperative |
Shorten preoperative stay
Preoperative antiseptic shower
Proper hair removal
Rx-remote site Inf
Antimicrobial prophylaxis.
|
Proper hair removal |
Optimize nutrition.
Pre op warming.
Glucose control.
Stop smoking
|
| Intraoperative |
Asepsis & antisepsis.
Avoid spill in GI cases
|
Surgical technique:
- Hemotoma/seroma
- Good perfusion
- Complete debridement
- Dead spaces
- Monofil sutures
- Justified drain use( closed)
Delayed primary closure when indicated.
|
Supplemental oxygen
Intra op warming
Adequate fluid resusc.
Glucose control
|
| Postoperative |
Protect incision for 48-72
hrs
Remove drains ASAP
Avoid post op Bacteremia.
|
Post op dressing for 48-72
hrs |
Early enteral nutrition
Supplemental oxygen
Tight glucose control
Surveillance programs
|
Anti microbial prophylaxis
Prophylaxis: Why?
- Hospital acquired infection , of which SSI is the commonest, costs
about 170 million $ in UK
- SSI increase morbidity & mortality, Prolong hospital stay, and
increase medical care cost.
- Colorectal surgery -high risk of SSI due to contamination by contents
of large bowel
- Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis - reduces risk of wound infection
from 40% to 11%.
- Reduces need for long term antibiotic Rx- reduces development of resistance.
- In trials of antibiotics vs No antibiotics use in colorectal
surgery , the SSI rate was 12.9% vs 40.2%.
Reality check:
- UK audits :25 50% of all antibiotics prescribed - for
prophylaxis.
- Prophylactic use is often inappropriate than therapeutic use.
- Prophylactic antibiotic use is suboptimal in 40-50% of operations.
-
- lack of reliable process in the hospital.
- Lack of understanding.
Goals of Antibiotic prophylaxis
- Reduce incidence of SSI.
- Antibiotic Use supported by evidence of effectiveness.
- Minimal effect on Pts normal bacterial flora.
- Minimal adverse effects.
- Minimal change to Pts host defences.
*Antibiotic prophylaxis is an adjunct to , not a substitute for good
surgical technique.
Principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis
- Choice of antimicrobial agent and regimen.
- Timing and duration
- Route of administration.
Choice of antimicrobial agent
- Regimens designed should cover the entire spectrum of suspected microbes.
In colorectal surgery both aerobes & anaerobes..
- No antibiotic reliably superior than other, when each possessed similar
& appropriate antibacterial spectrum.
- >70 different antibiotic regimens exist- effectiveness similar.
-
- Past history of adverse event- preclude use of particular gr of
antibiotics.
-
- Prophylactic Antibiotics ,chosen as per local prevalence of antibiotic
resistance.
-
- Search for ideal prophylactic regimen continuous process.
Avoid ,Universal acceptance and use of any particular regimen
Timing and duration
- Concentration of antibiotics in the surgical wound should exceed MIC
of the bacteria at the time of bacterial contamination, to prevent infection.
- Most effective when begun preoperative & continued per operative.
- First dose within 30 mins of anesthesia induction.
- Antibiotics started as late as 3 hrs after contamination are markedly
less effective.
- Single dose regimen vs multiple dose regimen- no significant difference.
- For prolonged surgeries repeated doses at intervals of 1 or
2 half lives for the drug.
- Decision regarding multiple dose regimen should be based on other
factors which increase the risk of infection, such as:
- Duration of surgery.
- Peri operative blood transfusion.
- Presence of drains.
- Immunocompromised state, etc,,.
Route of administration
- Prophylactic antibiotics for surgical procedures should be administerd
intravenously.
- Oral + parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis is advocated for colorectal
surgery. In RCT of Parenteral alone Vs parenteral + oral antibiotics,
significant reduction in infection rate in latter group.
Antimicrobial therapy of SSI
- Difficult- resistant bacteria due to pre operative antibiotic therapy.
- Should cover specific bacteria isolated and facultative & obligate
anerobic flora.
- D O C : 1. 3rd generation Cephalosporin or Quinolone + metronidazole.
2. Imipenem or expanded spectrum pencillins + b lactamase inhibitor.
3. In resistant enterobacteria or serratia aminoglycoside &
b lactam inhibitor.
- Superficial incisional: drainage only , no antibiotics.
- Deep incisional: Drainage, Control of source, Antibiotic Therapy.
- Organ/ Space SSI:
Operative , as any other sec peritonitis.
or
Non operative drainage CT or US guided ( if abscess not associated
with anastomosis.) with antibiotic therapy.
Antimicrobial drugs & their Spectrum
Pencillins.
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Pencillin G |
B- lactam mech.- inhibits bact.
Cell wall synthesis. |
short |
Strep sp. ( expt entrococcus
and pneumococcus.), Neisseria sp. |
| Antistaph.
Methicillin, Oxacillin, Nafcillin.
|
B- lact mech + pencillinase
resistant + acid stable |
short |
Staph sp ( meth sensitive) |
| Anti G -ve.
Ampicillin, Amoxicillin
|
B- lact mech |
short |
Strp sp.( including enterococci),
Neisseria sp.. H. influenze, E.coli, proteus. |
| Expanded spect.
Carbenicillin, Ticarcillin
|
B- lactam mech |
short |
Expanded G ve act. Mod
anaerobic act, |
| Very adv spect
Mezlocillin,piperacillin
|
b-lactam mech |
short |
Same as expanded spectrum +
more act against pseudomonas, acinetobacter, serratia. |
Pencillins + B-lactamase inhibitors
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Clavulinic acid +
Ticarcillin/amoxicillin
|
Inhibits b-lactamase Increases
antibacterial act. Of b-lactam antibiotics. |
Short/
medium
|
+ staph, H. influenzae, anaerobes |
| Sulbactum +
Ampicillin
|
- do - |
short |
+ enterococcus |
| Tazobactum +
Piperacillin
|
- do - |
short |
+ staph, some G ve rods
&anaerobes. |
Cephalosporins.
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| First Generation
Short h/l:Cephalothin, cephapirin.
Long h/l:Cefazolin.
|
b-lactam mech. |
short |
Strep sp ( expt enterococci),Staph
(meth. Sens.), few G ve rods. |
| Second gen.
Poor anaerobic act .
Short h/l: Cefamandole, cefuroxime
Long h/l: Ceforanide.
Good anaerobic act.
Short h/l: cefoxitin.
Long h/l: cefmetazole, Cefotetan.
|
- do - |
Medium
Short
Long
Short
long
|
Same as I gen cephalosporins
+exp G ve act ( expt pseudomonas, acinetobacter, serratia.
Same as above + many anerobes.
|
Cephalosporins
cont
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Third Gen:
Poor pseudomonas actShort h/l: cefotaxime, cetizoxime.
Long h/l:
Ceftriaxone
Good pseudomonas act.Cefoperazone, Ceftazidime, Cefepime
|
B- lactam mech. |
Short
Long
medium
|
Most G ve rods expt
pseudomonas, acinetobacter, serratia. Poor anerobic act. Less act
against strep & staph sp.
Same as above + act against pseudomonas, acinetobacter, serratia.
same as above + more G +ve act
|
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Monobactams
Aztreonam
|
B lactam mech. Preference
to pbp3 of G ve bacteria , b lactamase resistant. |
short |
Most G ve , including
pseudomonas & serratia. Inactive against G =ve cocci, anaerobes. |
| Carbapenems
Imepenem/ cilastatin
Meropenem
Ertapenem
|
B lactam Mech + Cilastatin
Mech ( inactivates dihydropeptidases.) |
Short
Short
long
|
Extremely broad G
+ve & G ve aerobic & anerobic. Mod active against e-cocci.
- do -
More active against enterobacteriae . less against G +ve cocci.
|
Quinolones
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Poor anaerobic act.
Norfloxacin
Ciprofloxacin
Ofloxacin
levofloxacin
|
Inhibits DNA-gyrase, inhibits
DNA replication |
Long
Long
Long
Long
|
Very broad G ve act
, including Pseudomonas, serratia & acinetobacter.
G +ve act, Poor anerobic act.
|
| Better anerobic act.
Gatifloxacin
Moxifloxacin
|
|
Very long
Very long
|
As above + better G +ve , G
ve & anerobic coverage. |
Aminoglycosides.
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Gentamycin
Tobramycin
Amikacin
netilimycin
|
Binds to 30s ribosome subunit,
inhibits protein synthesis |
medium |
Broad G ve coverage.
Poor act against strepto sp. No anerobic act. |
Anti anerobes.
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Chloramphenicol |
Binds to 50s su, inhibits protein
syn. |
long |
G + ve & few G ve
rods, most anerobes. |
| Clindamycin |
- do - |
long |
Strep sp. Expt enterococci,
staph sp, anaerobes. Inactive against G ve rods |
| Metronidazole |
Not fully known , probably
cytotoxic. |
Very long |
Very act against most anerobes,
protozoa. Inactive against facultative & aerobes. |
Miscellaneous.
| Drug class & name |
Mechanism of action |
Half life |
Antibacterial spectrum |
| Glycopeptides
Vancomycin
|
Inhibit cell wall synthesis
& RNA syn. / affects membrane permeability |
Very long |
Strep sp. Including ecocci,
staph ( including MRSA), clostridium Sp. No activity against G ve
rods. |
| Streptogram
ins
Quinupristin/ dalfopristin
|
Binds to 50s su |
medium |
Most G +ve bact,( including
VRE,MRSA, pencillin resist S- pneu.) |
| Macrolides
Erythromycin
|
- do - |
medium |
Most G +ve Neisseria, campylobacter,
mycoplasma, Chlamydia, rickettsia, legionella |
| Tetracyclines
Tetracycline
Doxycycline
|
Binds to 30s su. inhibits protein
syn |
Long
Very long
|
Many G +ve, easy G + ve rods,
some anerobes, rickettsia, Chlamydia, mycopasma. |
Antibiotic prophylaxis in Colorectal surgery.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis is Highly recommended.
- The risk of SSI following Colorectal surgery is 40 to 60 % without
prophylaxis.

Preperation for elective colorectal surgery :
Condon Nichols Preperation.
Preoperative day: Oral sodium phosphate
solution with or without Bisacodyl in a 1 to 2 dose regimen before administration
of oral antibiotics .
+ Clear liquid diet.
+ 1 gm each of oral Neomycin & Erythromycin taken at 19, 18 and
9 hours prior to surgery.
Operative day: Completely evacuate
the bowel prior to surgery.
+ Parenteral antibiotics 30 mins
prior to incision ( an Aminoglycoside or Cephalosporin like Cefotetan
/ Cefoxitin in combination with Clindamycin / Metronidazole.)
Benefits of Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- The benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis in terms of the incidence of
SSI after elective surgery is related to the severiy of the Consequences
of the SSI. ( for eg. In colon anastomosis , prophylaxis reduces mortality)
- Shortens the hospital stay.
- Faster return to normal activity.
Risks Of Prophylaxis.
- Inappropriate use of antibiotics for prophylaxis.
- Increased risk of C.difficile colitis (even single dose increases
risk , however more common after prophylaxis of > 24hrs.
Final decision regarding ,benefits & risks of Prophylaxis for an
individual pt will depend on:
-
- Patients risk of SSI.
- The potential severity of the consequences of SSI.
- The effectiveness of prophylaxis in that operation.
- The consequences of prophylaxis for that patient
( e.g. increased risk of colitis)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis : Conclusions.
- Antibiotics or antibiotics combinations should be active against both
aerobic & Anaerobic bacteria .
- Administration should be timed, so that the tissue concentration of
antibiotics around the wound area is sufficiently high when bacterial
contamination occurs.
- Single dose regimens are as effective as multiple dose regimens and
are associated with less toxicity, fewer adverse effects , lower bacterial
resistance rates and lower costs.
- Universal acceptance and use of one particular regimen should be avoided.
- Guidelines for prophylaxis should be developed and regularly reviewed,
locally by surgeons , microbiologists and pharmacists, taking into account
local resistance profiles.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis is an adjunct to , not a substitute for good
surgical technique.
|